- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 04:08, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Milqud (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Doesn't seem to be a notable band at all. Only links are to MySpace and band's page, which is a redirect to MySpace. Claims to have toured throughout the UK, but said claims aren't backed up by any sources. Only album is self released; only singles don't appear to have charted. The band's page was previously A7'd; this is supposedly a longer re-creation. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 20:23, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
EDIT::Milqud (pro. MILKWOOD) is currently an unsigned band, hence why there is nothing in the album charts, try visiting indiesolo.com as thats where they were crowned 2007 Presidential Pick Of The Year, they also competed in Bodog, and they are currently recording with Houston Boy, a rapper from Oklahoma. There is a huge fanbase that increases by the day, they have already had good comments from suh producers as Craig Hardy who claimed they hav the potential and WILL make it. The new website is also now up, and the myspace site has been revamped.
http://www.milqud.com http://www.myspace.com/milqud —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.177.112.55 (talk) 10:32, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete barely asserts notability (voted the best unsigned band... by whom?), no sources in article support notability, Google revealed no sources that could be added. <eleland/talkedits> 20:30, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- DeleteDoesn't have last names for members. No notability (has released only two songs) and website is still being constructed. It COULD be improved but... Mm40 (talk) 20:38, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Article asserts notability but fails to establish it. Beeblbrox (talk) 20:39, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete; Snowball Clause This article fails to establish notability so it doesn't even have a snowball's chance in hell of getting an unexpected stay from Delete, so there is no need to run it through the deletion process as of WP:band and WP:SNOWBALL --MahaPanta (talk) 22:45, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Very close to speedy delete under {{db-band}}. J.delanoygabsadds 23:31, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 02:40, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I also checked Google News archives and a library database of newspaper and magazine articles and could find no sources. Delete. --Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 02:47, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all of the above. tomasz. 10:20, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Asserts notability that doesn't seem to actually exist. PHARMBOY (TALK) 12:42, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.