Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mindless Eating Challenge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Mindless eating. MBisanz ^talk 00:06, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mindless Eating Challenge

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are no reliable, independent, secondary sources provided that demonstrate notability. At best, redirect to Mindless eating. Illia Connell (talk) 02:36, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New sources are provided. Including ones from as recently as a week ago.

The program was also published in a leading medical technology journal in the past month.

A number of additional outside sources -- including journalist and blogger coverage from the past week -- has been included. More detail about the results of the program and the broader implications for long term dieting programs and weight loss programs has also been provided. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SlimMom (talk • contribs) 20:54, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is its own entry -- and it has been the foundation of a number of other major efforts including research by the National Institutes of Health as well as commercial efforts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SlimMom (talk • contribs) 20:57, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Selective merge to Mindless eating. There is some coverage of this topic, but there may not be quite enough to qualify a standalone article on Wikipedia. Source searching is providing one short article and mentions. Examples include [1] (short article), [2] (mentions), [3] (mention), [4] (in Spanish) (mention), etc. Northamerica1000^(talk) 03:39, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:40, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 01:54, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 04:12, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 17:42, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.