- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete per WP:SNOW. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marasmusine (talk • contribs) 08:07, 3 July 2011
- Minecraft:Sheer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PROD-contested by article creator. Per WP:INDISCRIMINATE, guidelines at WP:GAMECRUFT. A single item from a video game is decidedly not notable enough for an encyclopedia article. elektrikSHOOS 10:03, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. - EdoDodo talk 11:48, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) MrKIA11 (talk) 16:43, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, pure game guide content, nothing notable to document on the topic. --Taelus (talk) 16:50, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- To the page creator: Wikipedia isn't the right place for these sorts of things, but there are Minecraft wikis available on the internet. Perhaps you could contribute to one of those? --Taelus (talk) 16:52, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Snow delete. Does not pass GNG and never will. Gamecruft and gameguide. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 19:27, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:GAMECRUFT, or else redirect to Minecraft. An article written in the second person about a single non-notable item in a video game. Erpert Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it? 23:37, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.