Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minerva (Transformers)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of Transformers: Chojin Masterforce characters. –MuZemike 22:32, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Minerva (Transformers) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Prod was removed without reason by User:Mathewignash. Prod reason was "not enough reliable sources to verify the info, let alone meet the general notability guideline." This is a followup to the removal. 陣内Jinnai 17:17, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect - As much as I like her; without critical and cultural impact, she's is an unnotable character. Stands up better in the List of Transformers: Chojin Masterforce characters. Sarujo (talk) 18:01, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Smerge to the list of characters. --Malkinann (talk) 20:26, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to List of Transformers: Chojin Masterforce characters Dwanyewest (talk) 21:37, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Smerge to List of Transformers: Chojin Masterforce characters. We should always look for an appropriate place to merge non-notable character articles first, per WP:PRESERVE, instead of outright deleting unless the character is incidental (either having no affect on the main plot or appears in only one or two episodes. So far, none of those advocating deletion have not argued that this is an incidental character. —Farix (t | c) 11:14, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per Sarujo. Non-notable. --Divebomb (talk) 15:48, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per Sarujo. Not notable as an individual. --Khajidha (talk) 16:16, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:16, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.