Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mini asymmetric radial keratotomy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The delete arguments show a clearer policy based examination of the sources by well established clueful user. A metoo keep without any explanation of what policy basis they found helpful adds very little to the keep side Spartaz ^Humbug! 08:06, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mini asymmetric radial keratotomy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article describes a form of surgery reportedly invented by an Italian eye surgeon, and referenced only to his work, self-sourced directory entries and commercial sites linked to him, plus one paper in German whose inclusion looks rather a lot like WP:SYN given that it doesn't appear to use the actual term. Guy (Help!) 15:09, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 15:18, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

leaning delete Got some GScholar hits but the cite count is very low. It appears to be something that was tried for a bit but didn't catch on. Mangoe (talk) 18:56, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and add a redirect to Radial keratotomy Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:49, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Deleted more primary sources. The review added is to a non pubmed indexed source. Still delete and redirect. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:51, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The page has been left in its poor state for a while, and that's partially my fault, since I first created it. Some of the points that have been discussed are true, though some are not, so I've improved the page accordingly. Here's a brief summary:

- the technique is known to have been invented by Abbondanza, I've added a review article, published by the International Journal of Keratoconus and Ectatic Corneal Diseases, which mentions it;

- the two Who's Who pages are now off, but here's the archived version of Marquis Who's Who. Nevertheless, I've removed both;

- Also, speaking of citations of GScholar, you will find that all in all there are about 30 of them, so not too few in reality;

- I've added two more references, both very recent and both from PubMed-indexed journals, concerning the validity of Minimally invasive asymmetric RK for the treatment of KC. You might note that only one derives from a study signed by Abbondanza. Also, the fact that they are from 2017 shows that, despite its relative rarity, it is still performed and cited;

- I've mentioned (and referenced) circular keratotomy and astigmatic keratotomy as other incisional procedures used to treat keratoconus. They're quite rare, too, due to the fact that they address specific and non-generic situations. Also, it gives a bit of relevant context;

- I've removed other references that were not strictly relevant.

The page is now improved, without non-relevant references and with new, very recent, PubMed-based ones. I invite you to re-read it and possibly change your mind in order to keep it, since it now provides useful and evidence-based information. Thanks, Manabeast333 (talk) 11:36, 14 December 2017 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: Manabeast333 (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD. — Manabeast333 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Keep As above EvilxFish (talk) 11:50, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.