Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miniweb Interactive

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:36, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Miniweb Interactive (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources provided, written like an advertisement and "Leadership" section essentially consists of unreferenced CV's Vrenator ^talk 15:12, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:21, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete: purely promotional and deliberately, rosily vague: enables converged broadcast and broadband entertainment on the TV, with a Connected TV Services Platform allowing easy navigation and consumption of internet video. Miniweb’s Platform provides a seamless experience across all content providers and empowers the viewer with global search, recommendations, micro payments, community, and personalization functions. Note prior speedy deletion as advertising, and suggest WP:SALT. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:34, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - In addition to being spammy, I can find no significant coverage about them that aren't press releases, or perss release rehashes. -- Whpq (talk) 17:08, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment There are references in this[1] version before a speedy was declined, but since then all references have been removed and it has become purely promotional. Probably needs to be completely written as an article including the references rather than an ad as it is now.Vrenator ^talk 08:44, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.