Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minnesota Monitor
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Coredesat 01:00, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Minnesota Monitor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non-notable web magazine. The references are all to blogs or to the Minnesota Monitor itself.
I am also nominating the following related page because the subject is a non-notable editor of the Minnesota Monitor:
Pablothegreat85 23:02, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete both as not notable. YechielMan 16:21, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Cited repeatedly on Wikipedia, article's been around since October. Can understand ditching the Mrty article, not as much the MinMon one.
Mrfeek 21:33, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply Actually, only two other articles link to this page, and one of them is the Robin Marty article. Pablothegreat85 23:29, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 01:46, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless independent reliable sources attesting to the subject's notability are found. Right now all sources are primary. Alternatively, future re-creation when reliable coverage appears is naturally permissible. --Dhartung | Talk 04:32, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete- little assertion of notability. Eaomatrix 15:16, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - limited assertion of notability, and weak attribution. Also, most of the links on the primary article are red, which usually indicates a lack of such notability. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sigma 7 (talk • contribs) 07:59, 29 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.