- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was - article was speedily deleted by User:Gwen Gale. --Stormie (talk) 05:09, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Minos Cluster (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Seems to be an extremely minor subject, even within Star Wars universe. In any case, there's no assertion of notability, or even real-world context, as the article is written entirely in-universe. I'd say it belongs at Wookiepedia, not Wikipedia. Mycroft7 (talk) 23:36, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. In-universe, unreferenced, fancruft. Vquex (talk) 23:40, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I'm generally not anti-cruft, but this is a little ridiculous. No sources and no notability. Paragon12321 (talk) 23:43, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Rob Banzai (talk) 23:51, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per those above. Unencyclopaedic and cruft-ish. —Mizu onna sango15Hello! 23:57, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- speedy delete added speed delete tag per WP:CSD G1 Medicellis (talk) 00:04, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:15, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.