- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:20, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Mint editor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod. Non-notable product. Lacks reliable sources and therefore fails WP:PRODUCT. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 12:12, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:21, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Very specialized product with limited notability (note that it can be used only to modify templates created from the mother company). If the company is notable it might become a part of a company focused article as described in WP:CORP and WP:PRODUCT Pxtreme75 (talk) 18:09, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.