Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mio P560

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Mio Technology#PDA navigation. J04n(talk page) 17:21, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mio P560

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable product also poor sources. Article style and clone are not per WP:MOS policy. Siddiqsazzad001 </Talk> 17:16, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 18:32, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:14, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:50, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Yeah, sources are pretty poor (including an article from WP), and the article is poorly formatted. But I found sources for verification and notability:
[1], [2], [3] and [4].

The article would require to be rewritten, but wouldn't be a problem for me. I already leave my "Possible keep" here... Gidev the Dood^(Talk) 19:56, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I rewrote the article and added sources. Gidev the Dood^(Talk) 20:36, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:21, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:13, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

~~delete~~- sources are promotional though secondary, and in depth. so no independence. specification based sources are press releases style. with this corpdepth is not there. Quek157 (talk) 15:46, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep, or redirect I looked at the current version of the article. It's marginal as far as both sourcing and content goes, but I don't think it's so bad it needs to be deleted. At a minimum, redirect to Mio Technology#PDA navigation, where it's mentioned, per WP:ATD. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:12, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per above, that the best WP:ATD I can think of as WP:CORPDEPTH is clearly not met --Quek157 (talk) 20:10, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Mio Technology#PDA navigation - only decent source is ZDNet, others are press releases or trivial mentions. PhilKnight (talk) 23:39, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.