- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No quorum, so WP:SOFTDELETE Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 12:50, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Mircea Perpelea (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
None of the claims for this BLP are sourced, and so there is no need to lend them any credence, but I will address three of them just the same.
1) "Director with the National Bank of Romania". To be clear, this is not the same as the Governor of the National Bank of Romania, who is notable. It simply means he's a manager there, one of some two dozen.
2) Prefect. While some prefects are notable for other activities they've undertaken, it's rare for this unelected position to bring notability by itself, and there's no evidence this is the case with Perpelea.
3) Consul in Marseiile. See WP:DIPLOMAT: notability is presumed for "diplomats who have participated in a significant way in events of particular diplomatic importance that have been written about in reliable secondary sources. Sufficient reliable documentation of their particular role is required." This standard is clearly not met for Perpelea. - Biruitorul Talk 18:15, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:32, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:32, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:33, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:34, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 17:57, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable enough as a bureaucrat, fails WP:DIPLOMAT, no relevant third-party sources on his career. Oh and, WP:COI... Dahn (talk) 20:01, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.