Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mis-confusion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Per User:Arakunem Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 20:29, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mis-confusion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

See WP:MADEUP Ironholds (talk) 15:38, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Even the Urban Dictionary link cited in the article says the term has not been defined yet. That's about as WP:MADEUP as it gets! Arakunem^Talk 16:21, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, useless. Punkmorten (talk) 19:47, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This is an unsourced dictionary definition of a neologism, and as such, it is not suitable for Wikipedia. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:14, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.