- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Onetwothree... 03:27, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Miscreant (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
WP:WINAD & badly written and misleading. Hopalfrubs (talk) 23:45, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:DICDEF and WP:NPOV The article offers a dictionary definition and then goes into some rigmarole about the Pakistani war, as if that is the primary context of the word. Eauhomme (talk) 05:41, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - textbook case of a dictionary definition - Whpq (talk) 15:29, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete' per ever reason listed above! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 16:29, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - really it hasn't been deleted yet? per nom - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs 08:22, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.