Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Supranational 2012

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 20:19, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Supranational 2012

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Year version of the already deleted Miss Supranational. Looks like promo, as it is referenced only my related sources. Google searche mainly lists social media or related websites as hits. The Banner talk 19:25, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, this applies to all articles in Category:Miss Supranational. Many of those articles are written or started by SPAs or clearly related people (like Mrdhimas). The Banner talk 19:40, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:12, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:12, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:13, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:GNG and associated tests. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:42, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - various reasons, but most compellingly, the pageant itself is not notable. Mabalu (talk) 12:57, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom - No evidence of any notability, Only crap I've found are all FB/Twitter related. –Davey2010 • (talk) 14:03, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can only find unreliable (facebook, twitter) sources. No significant coverage in third party reliable sources. Fails WP:N. Jim Carter (from public cyber) 10:20, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as per nomination. Did not meet the general notability guideline--Richie Campbell (talk) 02:36, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.