- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Non-admin closure. TN‑X-Man 13:19, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Miss Teen Nepal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- Delete non-notable, unreferenced, beauty pageant. Mayalld (talk) 06:29, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep A national beauty pageant, the refs, though currently primary, are in the external links. A clear case of Systemic bias, now if this goes then surely Miss Teen USA should also. RMHED (talk) 14:59, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- Systemic bias, You mean we should have article for every beauty pageant around the world. I do not see a point which suggests that it is national beauty pageant. Please look at the official website, it is two years old. There is no information whether this pageant still active or perished. Miss Teen USA is sourced article. Systemic Bias is an invalid support for keeping this article. Claims are sourceless, No third party link to support that this has any notability. A similar article was deleted under this discussion.A pageant should have stability and newsworthiness to be part of encyclopedia.Hitro 07:03, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:29, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, notability doesn't only apply to large countries. Little Red Riding Hoodtalk 22:46, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:14, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It doesn't matter where the pageant is, if it doesn't have reputable 3rd party sources, it isn't notable.--Terrillja (talk) 01:21, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep- if this was a major country, this would be a SNOW keep and an obvious one at that. Sources can surely, easily, be found for someone like this, who must have received mainstream coverage. People here may be disinclined to find them, but deleting it is the wrong course.JJJ999 (talk) 01:32, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep. Notability does not have to be world-wide, but it's spreading anyway. Nepal News, WaveMag, OhMyNews, NepalSite, CyberNepal, KantiPur, NepalMountainNews, Miss Teen Nepal 2006, friendsandtrends, etal. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 01:42, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as sources to show notability have been located; hopefully MichaelQSchmidt will add them to the article. Nice work though. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 02:58, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay... It's done... and I added a few more sources I found as well. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 02:51, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Schmidt. Cosmic Latte (talk) 06:54, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per MichaelQSchmidt. Shirulashem (talk) 23:00, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep This is a national beauty pageant and references have been found. Nice work, MichaelQSchmidt. DollyD (talk) 09:23, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.