Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Missed connection
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. —Tom Morris (talk) 13:31, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Missed connection (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seems to be an essay, not encylopedic Boleyn (talk) 16:42, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I favor retention. It is clearly a phenomenon of interest, and it informs people of it. 12.and.13 (talk) 01:16, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:13, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The title needs work as I thought this was going to be about missed air/rail connections. Metro has a column for this called "Rush-hour Crush". Anyway, there are multiple books about the Craigslist variety, e.g. Missed Connections: Love, Lost and Found. Warden (talk) 11:38, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep or userfy - I think it's not so bad that it needs to be blown up. Bearian (talk) 20:01, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.