- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete as hoax. Materialscientist (talk) 02:53, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Mitchum unit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
None of the inline external links appear to mention this "new" unit of measurement. I see no indication that this unit meets the general notability guideline, or even exists. VQuakr (talk) 18:16, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:54, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:55, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No sign of significant coverage in reliable sources from the Google searches above, nor from Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL. --Qwfp (talk) 21:31, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.