- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd(?!?) 00:58, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable; sports site with "27085 active and inactive members." RidG Talk/Contributions 06:16, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Little more than an advertisement. HumbleGod 06:27, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per the above. - Tapir Terrific 06:37, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Agreed, promotion of an individual site, i honestly think this page meets speedy deletion criteria - Duhon 4 July 2006 (UTC
- In light of the frenzied vandalism that's been going on for the past twenty minutes, I'd vote for either speedy or at least a temporary lock of the page. RidG Talk/Contributions
- Delete per the above. Treebark 16:37, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep No there is no need to delete it, at least yet. Let us work things out on the site and see if we can make sure somebody has a clean copy of the site so they can just change it back to the original after a vandal ruins it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by STLCards002 (talk • contribs)
- Weak Keep for the time being. 27,000 is still a lot. Sophy's Duckling 03:14, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Doesn't currently meet WP:WEB. -- Scientizzle 03:19, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no encyclopaedic information and no assertion of notability. TerriersFan 17:12, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.