- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Robert T | @ | C 00:32, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Brand-new website, with no Alexa ranking at all. Fails WP:WEB. Indium 05:31, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- It's in a launch process; Alexa ranking isn't of significance for the time being. If last.fm can stay, why can't this? Keep. --CriminalSaint 05:33, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Explanation: Wikipedia is not the place to promote a new site, but an encyclopedia. Last.fm was created in late 2003 and has an Alexa rank of 3,098 indicating they get sufficient visitors to be consider important enough for inclusion in an encyclopedia. - Mgm|(talk) 13:35, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Further to which: if your site is as good as you say, it will attract a lot of users and quickly become notable enough to meet our criteria for inclusion. Please do come back and recreate the article when you reach that stage. — Haeleth Talk 14:29, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable, non-neutral. wikipediatrix 05:37, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. nn Dottore So 13:07, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, website advert. - Mgm|(talk) 13:35, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.