Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mobile ecosystem

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --MCB (talk) 07:10, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mobile ecosystem (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This cites no sources and appears to be an essay or original research. It was PRODded for those reasons; the author responded with an {{underconstruction}} tag, so the PROD was removed by an admin who said "re-prod after a week if thought appropriate". Two weeks on, the article has not been changed. Looking at the internet, the term is bandied around a good deal, but it seems more of a buzz-word than having any consistent meaning, and I don't see sources that might form the basis of an article. JohnCD (talk) 16:10, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete - Google shows a lot of pages on "mobile ecosystem"s, but I agree with the nominator that it's more a buzz-word than anything else. There's the possibility that this concept is notable, but right now there's no assertion of notability, no sources, and really no clear value. Not opposed to recreation, but it needs some reputable sources to show that the subject is more than a buzzword. -FrankTobia (talk) 18:54, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - FrankTobia seems to have covered it all. I agree. Tim Ross·^talk 23:25, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.