Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mobile file management

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:40, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mobile file management

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Mobile file management (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT. Article has unreliable sources and reads more like an advertisement than an article. Dawnbails (talk) 16:38, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Software. Dawnbails (talk) 16:38, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• delete. I don't see how is it ads, but WP is not a manual, and the subject is not notable for an encyclopedia. Artem.G (talk) 09:39, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  My bad, I wrote that wrong; the citations read more like an advertisement, linking to GroupLogic and some unknown and now-defunct website. Dawnbails (talk) 12:39, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Full with technical inaccuracies and written quite poorly. No substantial sources either. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TandyTRS80 (talk • contribs) 07:11, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.