Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mobile search

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 11:43, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mobile search

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Mobile search (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Essay-like article describing a market from a marketing guide's POV. If it were to be trimmed, there would barely be an article left, and it's clear nobody's really touched it since 2010. Sourcing is terrible, and it's just served as marketer bait for a while. WP:TNT applies in my opinion, if this is even a notable topic at all. —moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 14:14, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor ^Talk 05:10, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:32, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:32, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete a how to essay that is poorly-sourced and where most of the text is nine years out-of-date. Does not satisfy the WP:GNG or any applicable WP:SNG. The concept is possibly notable but this article is so lacking it deserves WP:TNT so another editor may be able to start over. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:15, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.