Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mocka

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 01:35, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mocka

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Mocka (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Possible WP:ADPROMO, or at least doesn't appear to meet notability under WP:COMPANY. Sources cited are the company's own website, trade publications, and trivial mentions in newspapers. Muzilon (talk) 01:05, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Muzilon (talk) 01:05, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Australia and New Zealand. Curbon7 (talk) 13:00, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• del and advert of a nonnotable defunct business. Lokys dar Vienas (talk) 19:54, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails WP:NCORP. Zero RSs on the page and I couldn't find any. Cabrils (talk) 23:48, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:CORP. LibStar (talk) 23:05, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.