Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moda (association)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Can be recreated if sources are found. Shimeru (talk) 07:46, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Moda (association) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unnotable. Velcro Christmas Tree (talk) 15:09, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:45, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:45, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:45, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- weak keep a news archive search turns up a number of sources, none of them great. But it does look notable in the English sense of the word and so more detailed sources likely exist... Hobit (talk) 00:44, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Nothing but advertisement. --Prove you wrong (talk) 09:35, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.