- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. GedUK 15:41, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Model-Builder (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find significant coverage in secondary sources for this software. Note that this isn't ESRI's Model Builder. Pcap ping 23:48, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 23:50, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 00:04, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: This is GPL-licensed Free software/software libre. Samboy (talk) 22:39, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- That's irrelevant. The article fails WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 23:35, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Samboy. LotLE×talk 20:43, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No sources provided to even look at. The above two keep votes are disruptive and POINTy. Miami33139 (talk) 22:46, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 03:30, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.