- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Tiptoety talk 06:19, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Mogdaan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This character does not establish notability independent of its film. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 18:36, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Smerge to Warlords of Atlantis. No independent notability. Stifle (talk) 20:33, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/Delete no notability on its own. Reywas92Talk 20:51, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Delete per nom. Unsuitable for merge per WP:NOT#PLOT - undue weight given to primary source description of fiction. ~ Ningauble (talk) 14:46, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:52, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable fictional creature. No coverage in secondary sources. Article is just plot summary and in-universe details. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 06:37, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete One appearance hints at nonnotability. Pure plot summary and/or original research. – sgeureka t•c 19:09, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.