Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monatomic elements

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete both. --Coredesat 21:47, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Monatomic elements (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

ORMEs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (added 17:38, 13 November 2006 (UTC))

Blatant hoax. Contested prod. MER-C 13:42, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Hysterical pseudoscientific hoax. Source material includes 'science' book by well-known Holy Grail charlatan Laurence Gardner. AlexTiefling 13:46, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Mr Stephen 13:48, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Obvious hoax Baccyak4H 16:35, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment This article could possibly be salvaged if rewritten to be about the particular pseudoscientific theory that it is (rather than about some blatently false so-called facts). This could mean acknowledging the nomination is POV-based as well. Baccyak4H 17:47, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I've added ORMEs to this nomination, as it had virtually the same content. --ais523 17:38, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • I've also reverted an edit by the same editor linking monatomic to these articles. --ais523 17:41, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Poor thing. Stammer 20:07, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete both. Obvious nonsense. I do not think the pseudoscientific theory has yet got enough legs to be notable. Of course if they are kept, one should be a redirect to the other. --Bduke 01:55, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete — Clearly in WTF territory. Is this some sort of hermetic belief system? — RJH (talk) 21:16, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.