Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monetary Approach to The Balance of Payments
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was blank as copyvio. MER-C 08:52, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Monetary Approach to The Balance of Payments (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Dangerously close to copyvio (Deplication Detector) Besides that, a very British viewpoint. Night of the Big Wind talk 00:16, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 December 10. Snotbot t • c » 09:57, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment If the allegation is that the article is a copyvio of the paper by Ardalan I do not think that stands up on a superficial comparison of the two papers. I would expect to find some phrases in common and the plagiarism analysis provided by the nominator seems to contain false positives. As for the article being from a British perspective (which Ardalan's is not), that is true but if we start deleting articles because they have not been internationalised a great deal of WP would have to go. On the face of it the topic is notable but I will leave it to others to judge whether the topic is adequately covered elsewhere. --AJHingston (talk) 15:18, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I you don't see a copyvio-problem, that is okay. In my opinion, it came close to it, so I wanted more opinions. Night of the Big Wind talk 15:29, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- This page also copies from [1]. I have blanked it and listed it at Wikipedia:Copyright problems. MER-C 08:53, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.