Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monorail modelling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:53, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Monorail modelling

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article PRODed in 2010 as it was suspected of being used to promote an external link. PROD removed by creator but there are still no references and the topic does not seem encyclopaedic. Mccapra (talk) 22:15, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:41, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - there's no reason why the subject cannot be adequately covered in the monorail article, suitably referenced. Mjroots (talk) 15:51, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article is rough and lacks sources. I agree the topic of modeling monorails can be covered in the article about monorails.TH1980 (talk) 03:44, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lacks reliable sources. Reddragon7 (talk) 05:07, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete plausible if minor hobby. unsourced since 2010. my searches don't bring stuff up.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:03, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No reliable sourcing found, a search from GNEWS brings out nothing. Lapablo (talk) 20:32, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.