Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Montage (software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Davewild (talk) 08:19, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Montage (software)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page is little more than an advertisement for a bit of software, no indication through Google search of notability. Primefac (talk) 18:22, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - Software article of borderline notability. The two refs provided, MacNN and applelinks.com, do not appear to be particularly high quality sources; neither has a clear editorial policy, and it is unclear if they produce advertorial content. The various MacNN mentions are routine announcements of new version releases. A search did turn up a macworld review and a number of incidental mentions. Macworld is higher quality than the current refs, and the software may be notable enough to keep.Dialectric (talk) 18:00, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 02:51, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - nothing suggests the subject meets WP:NSOFTWARE criteria. No reliable sources given.--Rpclod (talk) 12:43, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep as well because although it hasn't received considerably large coverage, I found a few links like the MacWorld and MacLife reviews and Highbeam and Thefreelibrary. SwisterTwister talk 18:06, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:52, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.