Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morning width

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Glossary of astronomy#M. Missvain (talk) 00:24, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Morning width

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Morning width (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:DICDEF. Oddly enough, the only reference takes me to a webpage explaining the GNU license. Even if this topic is notable, I recommend we follow the wise advice at the WP:JUNK essay and just scrap this thing. Hog Farm (talk) 05:35, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm (talk) 05:35, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to Glossary_of_astronomy#M where it is mentioned. Using a simple WP:BEFORE-style search, I easily fixed the Gcal reference and added two more, an astronomy text and a review of a historical source. With these sources, the term looks verifiable. I haven't found sufficient sourcing for notability, but there is already a good target for merging--its entry in the glossary of astronomy. It is our policy, per WP:ATD, to prefer merging verifiable material to deletion when there is a reasonable merge target. Following policy, I recommend a merge. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 19:55, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge per above. Praemonitus (talk) 17:23, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 18:30, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to Glossary_of_astronomy#M per Mark viking's results. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 23:36, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.