Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morphogenic network

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Tawker 01:19, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be meaningless gibberish. Term does not exist on the web outside of wikipedia. Nonsuch 22:56, 12 May 2006 (UTC) (Addendum: Amusingly, despite the strong reaction below, no less than 8 users have made minor typographical or grammatical corrections to the article over the last 4 months. Such is the nature of the Wikipedia. Also, as noted below, the hierarchical page Morphogenic network/Inspiration for morphogenic network needs to go also. Nonsuch 00:23, 13 May 2006 (UTC))[reply]

• Strong Delete to the extent that this article is intelligible, it is Original (very!) Research. Zero sharp 23:39, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete, this article is an elaborate hoax that has little or nothing to do with Morphogenesis. wikipediatrix 23:51, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete as randomcrapcruft M1ss1ontomars2k4 23:52, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as OR. Article should not have been brought over from Wikinfo. Note: hierarchical page Morphogenic network/Inspiration for morphogenic network should be deleted also. --BillC 23:56, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Original research at best; elaborate rambling hoax at worst. Reyk _YO! 23:59, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as complete bollocks. Just zis Guy you know? 16:27, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.