- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. KTC (talk) 00:08, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Mosekilde (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A surname shared by 11 people, including our two redlinks does not satisfy WP:GNG. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 23:13, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. As far as I can tell, the two listed individuals aren't notable. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:47, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 12:54, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete though the two academics listed are probably notable, based on Google Scholar and this search on Politiken – the latter giving results mostly about Leif. However, as long as nobody has written Wikipedia articles about them, the surname article lacks a reason to live. Favonian (talk) 13:28, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.