- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 15:49, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Most Expensive (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
AfDs related to discussion for this article:
Yet another non-notable pricing game from The Price Is Right. Absolutely no sources found anywhere, nor are any forthcoming. Per the discussions linked to the right and countless others like them, there is a very rapidly growing consensus that absolutely none of the pricing games are likely to prove themselves worthy of an article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 17:46, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – Not notable, unsourced, already covered in List of The Price Is Right pricing games Sottolacqua (talk) 17:47, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no evidence of notability to suggest this needs a separate article.--BelovedFreak 18:09, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow Talk 22:01, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.