Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Motive for Movement

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Anas ^talk? 23:00, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Motive for Movement (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable + self-promotion: user "Motiveformovement" appears to have made most of the edits. I'm willing to bet that the creator of the article - "Sevendays487" - is also connected with the band. Hux 09:46, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete for failing WP:MUSIC. No sources except a MySpace page given, none likely to be found. --Huon 12:39, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 13:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 13:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Evil Spartan 17:32, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete myspace promo, and COI are just the start. Darrenhusted 19:43, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per lack of notability through media Corpx 20:28, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, self-promotion, fails WP:MUSIC.--Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 08:00, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per all. Unreferenced, and doesn't even really claim notability. Precious Roy 09:25, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.