- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:38, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- MuEv (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Despite a thorough search, I could not find any reliable secondary sources that discuss this topic. I have come to the conclusion that this article fails WP:GNG and should be deleted. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 22:08, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:52, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:52, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:07, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:07, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: WP:NEOLOGISM, which appears to be the pet term of one particular Patent Author. Existence on the freedictionary is neither here nor there as it's an aggregator (FWIW, it took "MUEV" from AcronymFinder, which accepts user-submitted items and indicates that this acronym is very rare). It's possible that there's some aspects of this article which are not covered in Audio to video synchronization and/or Lip sync, but if so then one or both of those articles should be expanded without using this term.~~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~~ 11:22, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete term seems to be coined and not in general use. Legacypac (talk) 12:17, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.