- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:36, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- MuParser (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability not established. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 10:15, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This is a useful parsing library that unfortunately has not gotten a lot of independent coverage. There is a technical report from U. Paderborn that has in-depth coverage of muparser and is independent of the creator, but it is the only in-depth independent source I could find. Unless more RSes are found, the topic falls below the threshold for general notability guidelines, per WP:GNG. This suggests deletion, with no prejudice to re-creation if more independent sources are found or become available. --Mark viking (talk) 16:59, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.