- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:29, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Mu Iota Alpha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Notability not asserted or evident. Decoratrix 04:36, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Was unable to find any vestige of notability. Simply being a fraternity or sorority is not notable. Decoratrix 04:36, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy
CloseDelete:Article deletedNo assertion of notability, very short article containing little context, no sources. - Rjd0060 05:00, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply] - Note The article has not been deleted. There was a problem with the links, which is now corrected. --Malcolmxl5 05:03, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete An article about an organisation that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant. --Malcolmxl5 05:08, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete Feels hoaxy. (Though given that there's a picture, it's a well-thought-out hoax.) Google search on "Mu Iota Alpha" (in quotes) returns only WP mirrors, spam pages and unrelated results. "Mu Iota Alpha"+Puerto Rico only returns WP mirrors. There is a sorority called "Alpha Iota Mu," but it was not founded in Puerto Rico or in 1936. I would think that any sorority founded that long ago would have at least one non-wiki Google result. LaMenta3 05:24, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn. JJL 22:59, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.