- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 01:53, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable video made for a school project. --Danielrocks123 03:34, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Completely non-notable. ---Charles 03:36, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as WP:Complete Bollocks. Eddie.willers 03:42, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as unverified, but (plug, plug) notability isn't the best criterion for deletion.Ziggurat 03:44, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and WP:NFT (regardless of how long this took to create). Jammo (SM247) 03:59, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-notable, unverified, and fails Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day. --Coredesat 07:08, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no secondary sources referenced, and article could be written in a more encyclopedic fashion. snug 14:10, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. COngrats to snug for his first non-bio AFD vote. :) ---J.S (t|c) 17:06, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete EdwinHJ | Talk 19:55, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.