Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad's Monsters (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 is almost Singularity 01:57, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad's Monsters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

The first AfD for this article resulted in a "no consensus" closure. DRV overturned, citing a failure to address the issue of lack of sources and verifiability in the original debate. Delete, per WP:V concerns. Xoloz 15:19, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, no evidence of notability. ITAQALLAH 16:38, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as nominated. Since there's no reviews from verifiable sources in the three years this book has been in print, it seems the chances of writing an informative, sourced, neutral article on this book are pretty slim. Sidatio 19:01, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The book's author is not "so historically significant that any of his or her written works may be considered notable". It does not meet the other 4 criterias in WP:BK either. → AA ^(talk) — 21:22, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.