Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Lotusflower
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous (talk) 01:12, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This person does not appear to actually exist, according to a Google search. Also, the article contains many subtly ridiculous claims about his past, and there are no sources cited. I suspect this is entirely fabricated. Dglynch 04:51, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
There is nothing regarding the past experiences of Mr. Lotusflower that can be construed in the slightest way outlandish, unless you view attending a Go Team! concert as unbelievable. All of the individuals cited in the posting are used as influences towards his ideology, rather than contemporaries or partners.
- Delete per nomination. - Dglynch 04:51, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Hoax / nonsense. --keepsleeping say what 05:15, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete hoaxy hoaxy hoax hoax hoax. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 05:20, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above --Rogerd 05:27, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom ≈ jossi fresco ≈ t • @ 07:06, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, also per nom. --PeruvianLlama(spit) 07:47, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete vanity. I meant to nominate this yesterday (came across it in the great CFRU-cruft muckout), but forgot. Bearcat 01:27, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.