- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:10, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Muhammad Shaikh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested prod. Article is an advertisement for Shaikh and his series of video lectures/organization. No reliable sources provided and I could not find anything outside of facebook/myspace/linkedin profiles. TNXMan 11:46, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:59, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Essentially a praise article. I was involved in an edit war a couple of weeks ago that resulted in a less praise-y article ([1]) but still did not establish notability. I was tempted to list this article here at that time, but I did not want to give the impression that I was trying to settle a content dispute through deletion. KuyaBriBriTalk 15:36, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:36, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Niteshift36 (talk) 07:14, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. Praise article full of peacock terms. Trevor Marron (talk) 20:56, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Non-notable advertisement piece, possibly written by the subject. لennavecia 21:13, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.