Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multi Purpose Chemical

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 07:52, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Multi Purpose Chemical

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Multi Purpose Chemical (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn (talk) 19:17, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:45, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:45, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:10, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - there's a section on tours, which would make the band notable; but there are no sources at all. Technically this is a WP:BLP violation. Bearian (talk) 19:47, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: fails GNG and NBAND. No WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. Ping me if sources are found.  // Timothy :: talk  16:27, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion, survived previous AFD.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:34, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 02:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.