Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multimedia Australia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. joe deckertalk to me 20:24, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Multimedia Australia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The sources provided are either self-published or do not mention the company, and I can not find any reliable sources myself. The article claims the "company is primarily known for its role in establishing the Software Industry Professionals", but I can't find any reliable sources for Software Industry Professionals either. Much puffery, but nothing to indicate it could meet WP:ORG. Contested prod. Electrified Fooling Machine (talk) 10:41, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:05, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:06, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I'm also having trouble finding sources for the organisation, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BestAddress HTML Editor, SwiftDownloads.com, siprofessionals.org or "Software Industry Professionals". --John Vandenberg (chat) 08:03, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - A glorified web design firm with no coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 14:05, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:CORP. John Vandenberg's search proves no reliable sources exist. LibStar (talk) 15:21, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Seems to lack significant independent coverage. FuFoFuEd (talk) 14:48, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.