- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 04:20, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to be a Pokemon-type idea made up by the article author. No sources are given or even alluded to. Google searches like multimon "multiple monsters", multimon egg and multimon Xyclone turn up nothing. (There are lots of results for "multimon" because the name is used for software, etc.) Looks like it violates WP:NFT. FreplySpang 00:18, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Also including Multimon egg in this nomination. FreplySpang 00:22, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Agreed, complete nonsense, google shows nothing, and no citations are given ShakingSpirittalk 00:20, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete appears to be original research. Demiurge 00:22, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as original...somethingoranother. The article now in fact admits to being the product of the author's imagination. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 01:07, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete both per CSD G1 (nonsense) G3 (silly vandalism) and G7 (author wants articles to go bye-bye) Tubezone 01:27, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- G1, G3, and G7 like the idea of speedy delete. Shin'ou's TTV (Futaba|Masago|Kotobuki) 01:38, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedichu I choose you per Tubezone. Danny Lilithborne 03:36, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.