Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mumbai Science

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 01:13, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mumbai Science

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Awards are not major. nothing notable here. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:27, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. S.G.^(GH) _ping! 14:48, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. S.G.^(GH) _ping! 14:48, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. S.G.^(GH) _ping! 14:48, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete on my hit list and then I've been off WP for a year, non-notable self-promotional puff with a list of references from self-posted web pages (ie beatport etc.) CaptainScreebo ^Parley! 22:09, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment not all of the citations are to self-published sources. The source at Fuzz Magazine, a Belgian electronic music magazine in Flemish, seems to be independent. It is an interview, so most of it would only qualify as reliable under Self-published and questionable sources as sources on themselves. Also two citations that might have been independent are deadlinks. --Bejnar (talk) 23:33, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails on notability, coverage is simply not wide enough. Semitransgenic _talk. 14:58, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 03:20, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails notability. Questionable sources listed as references. --Jersey92 (talk) 03:25, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Cool name. I can't find anything to support its notability. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:31, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.