- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:SNOW MBisanz talk 07:37, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Mummybot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Not quite incoherent enough to qualify for CSD'ing, but non-notable and silly just the same. --Dynaflow babble 21:08, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete looks like a hoax. twirligigLeave one! ⋄ Check me out! 21:21, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete Definitely a hoax. A google search returned usernames, and a philosophy website. "Mummybot schism" returned only this article.Hello, My Name Is SithMAN8 (talk) 22:09, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Codswallop. JohnCD (talk) 22:22, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedily Delete under CSD G3 as (rather odd) hoax. – Toon(talk) 00:37, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as both hoax and nonsense. I genuinely have no idea what the intended subject matter of this article is. AlexTiefling (talk) 00:42, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Because, in the article's own words, it "defies explicit definition," let's not define it. •••Life of Riley (talk) 04:53, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.