- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedily deleted under CSD G3. Non-admin closure. Safiel (talk) 02:40, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Mundo (Hun) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article was created by a user whose only edit has been to create this article. The article's first draft appeared to be a copy/paste from somewhere, given its formatting but I can't find that it's copied from any online sources. Outside of that, the prose seems intentionally confusing ("Called by the Scaramuzes >Hertha< after a variant: Hertha of the old Germanic death-, winter- and otherworld-goddess, who is also known otherwise as Harke, Hel, Holle, Perchta, Frigg, Sinnachtgunt, Gode, Wulle, the devil`s grandma,in greek Hekata a. s. o.") I've checked some of the seemingly notable nouns mentioned in the article and can't find any proof that they exist. "Origio Gothica of Jordanis" produces no Google hits. "Vita of Saint Severin by Eugippius" also produces no hits. "Hertha and her Blocksberg" also produces no Google search hits. Given the amount of information that seems to be made up for this article and that there are no references given outside of entire books (or books that don't seem to exist), I believe that this is a hoax. I may be wrong but hopefully this discussion can clear things up. OlYeller21Talktome 00:44, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete - It's either a hoax or MADEUP. I was unable to find any sources when checking Google News, Google Books, JSTOR, HighBeam, Questia, Credo and NewsBank. - MrX 01:28, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I was going to speedy but I didn't feel confident enough to call it an unabiguous hoax. I wouldn't oppose it, though. OlYeller21Talktome 01:35, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete hoax or someone's inside joke. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:45, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete Clearly a hoax and I will go ahead and tag it. Safiel (talk) 02:19, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.