Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muscle derived stem cells

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MaxSem^{(Han shot first!)} 21:40, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Muscle derived stem cells (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Fails WP:RS and WP:N Fallen Angel 00:33, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete science spam. Wikipedia is not the place to publish original research. Blast Ulna (talk) 00:45, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no verifyable or reliable sources stated. Someone removed the AFD tag on the page. --Starionwolf (talk) 00:58, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete It is not spam, but it is WP:OR. JAMA or similar would be the appropriate avenue for original research in need of peer review. If there is a body of published research in this area, the article would succeed with a full rewrite. --- Taroaldo (talk) 07:32, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. tim.bounceback 22:31, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • redirect to Myoblast. Same thing--Lenticel ^(talk) 00:11, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - As it stands, original research. If anyone can demonstrate a large body of academic discussion regarding this and wants to edit the article, I might change my mind.Coanda-1910 (talk) 19:05, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.