- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep (non-admin close) RMHED (talk) 19:08, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Mush Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Appears to fail WP:CORP. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:53, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I happen to be very familiar with Mush Records and some of it's artists. Aesop Rock being my favorite. At any rate, this article needed to be tagged for several things which I have done, but it certainly has potential and should NOT be deleted. Carter | Talk to me 18:31, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Just added some new sections, and tried a little cleaning. Not much, but with some work it will be much better. Carter | Talk to me 18:38, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep a massive roster of notable artists; this is clearly a culturally significant label. Chubbles (talk) 21:14, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep XLR8R magazine recently devoted an hour podcast mixed with only Mush artists, so my vote is for keep. That being said the page needs allot of work!
Pedter (talk) 02:14, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.